The Assayer: Elementary Calculus: An Approach Using Infinitesimals The Assayer - book reviews and discussion for the free-information renaissance
home    help    links    log in    log out    add or review a book    contact
Browse by    subject    author    title    reviewer

Elementary Calculus: An Approach Using Infinitesimals

AuthorJerome H. Keisler Entered2004-01-08 08:58:02 by Ryanov
Editedit data record FreedomCopylefted, but with restrictions on modification and/or sale (disclaimer)
SubjectQ.A - Mathematics. Computer science (analysis)
Read
http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html
This link was reported to be OK by user Ben Crowell on 2004-01-11 11:23:52
You can't update this URL or report it OK or broken because you aren't logged in.
ReviewYou can't add a review of this book right now because you're not logged in.
Notify
I wish I'd learned calculus from it!
by Ben Crowell (crowell09 at stopspam.lightandmatter.com (change 09 to current year)) on 2005-01-26 14:41:04, review #441
http://www.lightandmatter.com
content
better than 80%
writing
typical

Textbooks are usually unoriginal, because most teachers are conservative in their choices. They get used to teaching a subject a certain way, and don't want to change. This is a calculus textbook with a very unusual approach. It was published in 1976, and evidently was successful enough, despite its idiosyncracy, to justify a second edition a decade later. Its publisher, however, eventually allowed it to go out of print. The copyright has reverted to the author, and he has made it available in digital form on his web site. The digital book consists of pages scanned in from a printed copy and assembled into an Acrobat file, so it's a big download, and you can't do some things with it, such as searching the text for a particular word.

The title leaves no doubt that the book is different. Whereas most textbooks these days define derivatives and integrals in terms of limits, this one uses infinitesimals. The real numbers are generalized to make a numer system called the hyperreal numbers, which include infinitesimally small numbers as well as infinitely large ones. Essentially, this represents a return to the way Newton and Leibniz originally conceptualized the calculus, but with more rigor.

I don't know about other people, but when I learned calculus, I got very uneasy when we got to the Leibniz notation. My teacher said that dy/dx wasn't really one number divided by another, but rather an abbreviation for the limit of the quantity Δy/Δx. That wasn't so bad, but what really made me queasy was when he then suggested that you could usually get the right answer by treating these dx and dy thingies as if they were numbers. The scary part was that word "usually." What was legal and what wasn't? How many sizes of infinitesimals were there? Was it legal to say that 1/dx was infinite? What operations would lead to paradoxes? What about proofs that used infinite numbers to show that 1=2? The wonderful thing about this book is that you end up knowing exactly what you can and can't do with infinities and infinitesimals, and you get to use the Leibniz notation in all its intuitively appealing glory. For instance, the chain rule really can be proved simply by writing (dz/dy)(dy/dx)=dz/dx, simply canceling the dy's.

It would be interesting to see how students reacted to this book when learning calculus from scratch. I suspect that they'd have an easier time with many of the concepts like implicit differentiation, which seems so awkward in the traditional approach, but they might be scared a little by the initial development of the hyperreal number system. The book develops the hypperreal system axiomatically, which left me yearning for more of a constructive method. Then again, we develop the rational and real numbers axiomatically in high school, so maybe it's not such a big issue. My initial unease was cleared up by a few crucial examples:

After that, I began to see the hyperreal numbers as simply another tool for calculating things.

I confess, however, to a little residual indigestion at the way the author develops the integral. He introduces finite Reimann sums first, and gives several numerical examples. But next, instead of taking the limit of sums with more and more terms, he takes the finite sum with n terms, and replaces n with an infinite integer. Instant vertigo!

This is a wonderful, original textbook.

Information wants to be free, so make some free information.


This review has been revised. Earlier versions (viewing not yet implemented): -1
You cannot revise or reply to this post because you are not logged in.

A very interesting book
by dradetsky on 2004-11-07 17:25:10, review #431
content
better than 90%
writing
better than 80%
This book was a major influence in my decision to major in math. It's very interesting, very readable, and gives one a whole new perspective on calculus. I am now much more comfortable with many ideas that had baffled me in traditional calculus. For example, as Mr. Crowell points out, the differential dy makes a lot more sense now. Also, taking limits is a lot more straighforward now, for some reason. I would recommend that anyone who really needs to understand calculus use this book as a supplementary text.


You cannot revise or reply to this post because you are not logged in.

The contents of this web page, except the parts contributed by members of The Assayer, are copyright (c) 2000 by Benjamin Crowell, and are copyleft licensed under the Open Publication License 1.0, without options A or B.